Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 03.11.2012 15:38, schrieb Emmanuel Seyman:
> * "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" [02/11/2012 20:34] :
>>
>> That package would hardly be un-maintained if it has co-maintainers
>> now does it...
> 
> Absolutely. Hence my request that any process we put in place be
> package-focused rather than maintainer-focused

why?
how will you do this?
if there is nothing to change on a apckage it is at it is

if any maintainer not login he is INACTIVE
if a package has more maintainers it is no problem retire the inactive maintainer
if a package has only one maintainer and he is gone away the package has to be retired



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux