On 11/02/2012 03:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:12:56PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
As soon as an feature depends on other components or several other
components and their maintainers involvement/participation, then for
example the unresponsive maintainers policy conflicts with the
feature process given our relatively short development cycle. ( in
Can you explain that a little more? Do you mean the policy is too slow?
Dead/un-maintained packages need to be removed/reassigned at the
very *beginning* of an new development cycle so feature owners and
others working in the community are dealing with active and actively
maintained packages.
Okay. But I'm having trouble seeing how that's a blocker for incremental
improvement to the features process.
It's pretty apparent that there is no point in working with the feature
process et all if those issues aren't address first no matter how many
incremental improvements you make to the process or when you do it for
that matter.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
