Re: Mass changes to packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:11:39 -0400
Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 08/25/2012 09:16 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > 2. On UNRELEASED Fedora versions, i.e. Fedora 18 and higher, define 
> > %systemd_post as currently done, and %systemd_post_enable to the
> > exact same thing.
> 
> This is the problem: In F18+, systemd now uses a system-wide policy
> (which can be overridden) to define what services are enabled, it is
> no longer hardcoded into each package's scriptlets. This is the
> feature that FESCo approved. You might not agree with it, but simply
> ignoring it is inappropriate.

He's not ignoring it, he's saying that on F18+, the expansion of
%systemd_post_enable should be exactly the same as the expansion of
%systemd_post, i.e. not enabled by default and honoring whatever
presets are set for the spin.

This approach allows for spec files to be synced between all Fedora
branches and generate the appropriate scriptlets for each release when
built.

Paul.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux