On 08/21/2012 10:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I just received about a dozen bugs like this: >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:16:42PM +0000, bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850364 >> [...] >>> Summary: Introduce new systemd-rpm macros in watchdog spec file >> [...] > > Yeah, I got a couple of those too. I do not wish to make the proposed > changes, nor would I be happy if someone made them for me, because I do > not want to have unnecessary divergences between the spec files for > different Fedora branches. That not only creates issues for > cherry-picking updates, but it means that I can't for example test-build > a rawhide SRPM on my F16 work machine. If the incompatibility is > *necessary* then I'll put up with it, but as far as I can see this is > only cosmetic at this point. > > I'd like to see these macros back-ported into F17 and F16 RPM to remove > this objection. If that doesn't happen, I'm going to resist using them > in my spec files until they are in all active Fedora branches. I see no reason why these macros couldn't be back-ported to F17 & F16, they just wouldn't do the preset functionality. ~tom == Fedora Project -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
