Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:14:14 +0100
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It doesn't make sense to discuss requirements for becoming a primary 
> architecture without discussing whether it should be considered in
> the first place. I don't see ANY reasons why it's needed. And as I
> wrote in my first reply in this thread... 

<snip>

Yes, we know your position. No need to continue to reply to every email
in the thread repeating it. If you have some new info to add by all
means do so. 

Thanks. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux