Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/20/2012 10:54 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
As far as I know, this proposal is driven by community people, not Red Hat
people.

Many people in the Fedora ARM community are Red Hat people, but that's hardly relevant to the proposal.

We're starting now, that's what the secondary architecture is for. There's
no need for ARM to be a primary architecture for Fedora to be "ready" for
it.

No, Fedora ARM started years ago. There comes a point where a secondary cannot continue to grow. To become more than it is, it needs the support and interest of the main Fedora community. We are reaching that point. That is why we are having this discussion.

(And I don't see myself using an ARM as my primary machine in 2 years. It's
more likely that I'll still be using the same machines I use now, I don't
replace my hardware that often, and even this old Pentium 4 is faster than a
"fast" ARM machine.)

I sincerely doubt it. Compare specs to a Tegra 3 chip. And that's just a mobile system.

--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux