On 03/20/2012 12:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
What does "better than secondary arch" mean to you? I'm really struggling here.
As an example, the same koji server handling x86 builds handling ARM builds. The same facilities providing power, cooling, storage. Subject to applicability, the same QE mechanisms being employed. The same release schedule. Comparable positioning on the Fedora downloads pages. Primary and secondary are night-and-day different, it isn't just the integrated build system being disconnected, it's end-to-end.
We as a group have identified many of the roadblocks or pain points of bringing arm into primary arch.
What pain points have been described other than "I am concerned about the impact of builds on the whole running slower than they do now"? This is not a facetious question, this is really what we're trying to get from the thread.
-- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
