Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/20/12 12:14 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 03/20/2012 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
So if you're willing to live like that, I must ask again, what do you
think you'll be getting out of being a primary arch?

I'm willing to temporarily do better than secondary and worse than
primary on the road to becoming primary. This is a huge transition-
identifying the right path to make that transition is part of what this
is about. The whole point of this thread is to establish requirements
for promotion. Part of that discussion logically includes the steps to
get there. Currently what I hear is "be as good as x86 and you're
there." That's not productive. There are legitimate issues with moving
to PA so we're having this discussion to identify them and ultimately
work through them.


What does "better than secondary arch" mean to you? I'm really struggling here.

We as a group have identified many of the roadblocks or pain points of bringing arm into primary arch. You're suggested solution in this sub-thread is effectively treating arm as secondary arch, and when asked about this, you've avoided the question, once again, of what it is you expect to get out of being primary arch.

I'm really not sure how much more rational discussion we can have here.

--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux