On 03/20/2012 11:20 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Honestly I've yet to see a succinct list of reasons why secondary arch is no longer good enough for the ARM effort, for at least the next few releases. I may have missed it in the flurry of emails and debate, anybody care to recap it for clarity?
This was one of the points raised by FESCo yesterday, and it's a fine question that we'll be answering better, elsewhere, in due course. That said, where does this question lead? If we explain what we're trying to get to, will it somehow overcome the objections raised such as build system performance? For the sake of coherent discussion, let's assume that we have good reasons why we want to move to primary, and we can keep the subject on what the requirements are for doing so. The topic at hand isn't even ARM specific, it's just been prompted by us ARM aficionados. Again, I understand that there do need to be good reasons, that's just not the subject of this particular thread. So, other than build system performance, what are the requirements you'd like to see met?
-- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
