Am 10.02.2012 15:09, schrieb drago01: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> [..] >> ________________________________ >> >> POSSIBLE SOLUTION: >> >> each second release does not introduzce those big changes and >> only optimize existing things and bringing only new versions >> of packages require a "simple" mass rebuild for so-changes >> >> you can call it F17, F17.5 where F17 have a big chnage affecting >> the whole distribution and F17.5 is "only" a careful upgrade >> without intention to break stuff and require actions from >> all involved people >> >> take away the current pressure from maintainers as well users >> give the involved people time to breath >> this is opensource, there is NO SINGLE NEED to implement any >> possible good idea under pressure NOW and beeing first only >> for beeing first is not always the right hting > > Well it seems that you are better suited with using a distro like RHEL > (or one of its clones). no because i need current software-versions, but current does not mean broken/unfinished or baken in rush also even if i would be better suited (what is not the case) this would not change the fact that the current fedora release/devel process is broken and even as RHEL user this would cause sorrows on my side fedora would be close to a perfect distribution if there would not be so much useless feature-pressure in each release useless because if you are release every 6 months you will nothing lose spare out a big change to the next release and win overall quality and stability and at least it would not result in so many burned out maintainers which everybody can recognize if he openes his eyes currently fedira is on the best way to burn down it's contributors by blindly enforce changes an dpressure to them!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
