Am 10.02.2012 12:38, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Harald Hoyer <harald@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I really don't know why the REAL ACTIONS on this feature were started >>> that late in F17 release cycle - several months after branching. >> >> Because politics took so long. > > Which part exactly? > > * Half of July 2011! The feature page was created > > * Sep 29: Marked as ReadyForWrangler > * Oct 27 (+~1 month!): First reviewed by Feature Wrangler > * Nov 07 (+11 days): Approved by wrangler, on agenda for FESCo > * Nov 21 (+14 days): After much discussion, feature approved > > * Nov 14 (+7 weeks since feature proposed!, +7 days on FESCo agenda): > FESCo asked for FPC review > (AFAICT, feature owners typically include FPC review in scope of > their features themselves) > * Nov 21 (+7 days): FPC review initiated by FESCo > * Dec 8 (+2.5 weeks): Final FPC approval, RPM changes requested > > * Dec 15 (+2.5 months since feature proposed!, +3.5 weeks since > feature approval): ProvenPackager requested > * Jan 3 (+3 weeks): First ProvenPackager approved > * Jan 9 (+3.5 weeks): Second ProvenPackager approved > > * sometime after Jan 15 (+5.5 weeks since FPC asked for RPM changes!): > rel-eng contacted > * Jan 27 (+ <=2 weeks): rel-eng brings objections to FESCo > * Feb 2 (+ 1 week): objections resolved > > * Jan 24 (+2 months since feature approval! +7 weeks since FPC > approval! +13 days since second ProvenPackager): first feature-related > commits to Fedora git > > I'll grant you that the politics took some time, sometimes more time > than would be desirable, but most of the multi-month delays are > directly attributable to not even giving the politics a chance to > start. > Mirek I would say 7 weeks since FPC approval is a reasonable time frame for such a change. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
