On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:18:11AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:47:32 -0600, RS (Richard) wrote: > > > >> but that's a separate problem. The shear amount of > >> documentation/guidelines there are. > > > > Hey, :) you know what? Troublesome newbies would like even more > > documentation, guidelines and policy documents. Also a book about koji, > > bodhi, package git, fedpkg and more. ;-) > > > > The opposite doesn't fly either. Less guidelines resp. more brief ones > > (e.g. on packaging) would be considered insufficient and not clear > > enough, since there would be much more room for misinterpretation. > > I didn't imply that there should be less documentation or guidelines, > only that it's more than a person can "grok" at one time. My thoughts > are that it would be better if there was some way to ease people into > it, just as in school you don't go straight to Calculus or DE, but > start with geometry and then algebra and you work your way up to the > more complicated stuff, building your knowledge base as you go. > I'm not sure about easing people in but I do think there could be better organization. However, I don't have the knowledge to know what "tools" (organizational strategies) are out there or what keywords I need to feed to google to find a method to reorganize this well. If someone has knowledge of how to do that it would be great. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp_83iPBD8ov.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
