-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/30/2011 04:59 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, MichaÅ Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx> said: >> First, people are wondering if this change is compatible with some >> obsolete specification, next people are wondering if this change is >> compatible with distribution feature process. I repeat again, this is >> not a feature this is evolution. Lennart uses a big hammer here, but >> from a technical POV these changes makes sense. > > Please stop calling FHS obsolete, at least as long as the Fedora > packaging guidelines say it should be followed. > > I think the problem here is how this was done, not as much what was > done. Would it have been so much trouble to have discussed this in > advance? The FHS allows dsitros to add additional top-level > directories, but this was done by developers of a package, without any > distro discussion. We're well past F15 Alpha and almost to Beta; IMHO a > change like this should have been made sooner (or wait until next > release). There may be things that the systemd developers didn't think > about (what about SELinux policy for example; I haven't seen that > mentioned). > We are scrambling to get the policies updated, but it would have been nice to have more time. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2TmlkACgkQrlYvE4MpobPFqwCdGGHiYGn00/i/4dAzFO5O0GcF lNsAoLPaa5prsHq/rWNWkDCAZKU66LVQ =WSRi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
