On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 09:35 -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > Again, I'm not against that this is being done, but I would like to see > everyone equally follow suit on the way things are traditionally done > in Fedora land. Well, up to a point, Lord Copper. We have a features process with lots of bureaucracy and FESCo involvement and so on. What we don't have is any clear _enforcement_ of that process; there's no workable system that evaluates changes and requires sufficiently significant changes to be submitted as features. It's perfectly possible, and has been done lots of times, to simply go ahead and commit significant changes that _could_ have been 'features', not submit them as features, and happily bypass the entire 'feature' process with all its bureaucracy. /run would certainly not be close to being the first time this has happened. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
