On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:24:42AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 09:35 -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > > > Again, I'm not against that this is being done, but I would like to see > > everyone equally follow suit on the way things are traditionally done > > in Fedora land. > > Well, up to a point, Lord Copper. We have a features process with lots > of bureaucracy and FESCo involvement and so on. What we don't have is > any clear _enforcement_ of that process; there's no workable system that > evaluates changes and requires sufficiently significant changes to be > submitted as features. It's perfectly possible, and has been done lots > of times, to simply go ahead and commit significant changes that _could_ > have been 'features', not submit them as features, and happily bypass > the entire 'feature' process with all its bureaucracy. /run would > certainly not be close to being the first time this has happened. <SNIP> So we should disband FESCo and just let everyone commit whatever changes they want without oversight or community inclusion and just hope it builds and runs in the end? I can't stress this enough, I am not against this change and am actually in support of it. I am also a big fan of systemd and want to express my gratitude to those involved in all the work being done to make it a reality. I am, however, a little concerned with the precedence it is either creating or following in the path of. -AdamM -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
