2011/3/30 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 09:35 -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > >> Again, I'm not against that this is being done, but I would like to see >> everyone equally follow suit on the way things are traditionally done >> in Fedora land. > > Well, up to a point, Lord Copper. We have a features process with lots > of bureaucracy and FESCo involvement and so on. What we don't have is > any clear _enforcement_ of that process; there's no workable system that > evaluates changes and requires sufficiently significant changes to be > submitted as features. It's perfectly possible, and has been done lots > of times, to simply go ahead and commit significant changes that _could_ > have been 'features', not submit them as features, and happily bypass > the entire 'feature' process with all its bureaucracy. /run would > certainly not be close to being the first time this has happened. Please do not try to kill evolution through the bureaucracy. Lennart fixed a long standing issue here and he did it in such a way that tree other major distributions accepted his solution. He also fixed a long standing issues with Linux init system. This is not a feature - this is evolution. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
