2011/3/30 MichaÅ Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2011/3/30 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 09:35 -0500, Adam Miller wrote: >> >>> Again, I'm not against that this is being done, but I would like to see >>> everyone equally follow suit on the way things are traditionally done >>> in Fedora land. >> >> Well, up to a point, Lord Copper. We have a features process with lots >> of bureaucracy and FESCo involvement and so on. What we don't have is >> any clear _enforcement_ of that process; there's no workable system that >> evaluates changes and requires sufficiently significant changes to be >> submitted as features. It's perfectly possible, and has been done lots >> of times, to simply go ahead and commit significant changes that _could_ >> have been 'features', not submit them as features, and happily bypass >> the entire 'feature' process with all its bureaucracy. /run would >> certainly not be close to being the first time this has happened. > > Please do not try to kill evolution through the bureaucracy. Lennart > fixed a long standing issue here and he did it in such a way that tree > other major distributions accepted his solution. He also fixed a long > standing issues with Linux init system. This is not a feature - this > is evolution. Well we are on f-d-l and this is a change ... we all know what this evil combination causes ;) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
