W dniu 30 marca 2011 22:30 użytkownik drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> napisał: > 2011/3/30 Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx>: >> 2011/3/30 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 09:35 -0500, Adam Miller wrote: >>> >>>> Again, I'm not against that this is being done, but I would like to see >>>> everyone equally follow suit on the way things are traditionally done >>>> in Fedora land. >>> >>> Well, up to a point, Lord Copper. We have a features process with lots >>> of bureaucracy and FESCo involvement and so on. What we don't have is >>> any clear _enforcement_ of that process; there's no workable system that >>> evaluates changes and requires sufficiently significant changes to be >>> submitted as features. It's perfectly possible, and has been done lots >>> of times, to simply go ahead and commit significant changes that _could_ >>> have been 'features', not submit them as features, and happily bypass >>> the entire 'feature' process with all its bureaucracy. /run would >>> certainly not be close to being the first time this has happened. >> >> Please do not try to kill evolution through the bureaucracy. Lennart >> fixed a long standing issue here and he did it in such a way that tree >> other major distributions accepted his solution. He also fixed a long >> standing issues with Linux init system. This is not a feature - this >> is evolution. > > Well we are on f-d-l and this is a change ... we all know what this > evil combination causes ;) > First, people are wondering if this change is compatible with some obsolete specification, next people are wondering if this change is compatible with distribution feature process. I repeat again, this is not a feature this is evolution. Lennart uses a big hammer here, but from a technical POV these changes makes sense. -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
