Once upon a time, MichaÅ Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx> said: > First, people are wondering if this change is compatible with some > obsolete specification, next people are wondering if this change is > compatible with distribution feature process. I repeat again, this is > not a feature this is evolution. Lennart uses a big hammer here, but > from a technical POV these changes makes sense. Please stop calling FHS obsolete, at least as long as the Fedora packaging guidelines say it should be followed. I think the problem here is how this was done, not as much what was done. Would it have been so much trouble to have discussed this in advance? The FHS allows dsitros to add additional top-level directories, but this was done by developers of a package, without any distro discussion. We're well past F15 Alpha and almost to Beta; IMHO a change like this should have been made sooner (or wait until next release). There may be things that the systemd developers didn't think about (what about SELinux policy for example; I haven't seen that mentioned). -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
