Re: systemd and changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:13:26PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > That said, on the VM I tried F14 upgrading straight from F12 all seem
> > fine so far, although the output of systemctl is something I still need
> > to get used to (I wonder what "maintenance" means referred to the
> > status of a service) ...
> That means something isn't right with the service. For more details see:
> http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd-for-admins-1.html
> The term was stolen from Solaris SMF btw. 

How about "broken"? Shorter, more straightforward, and avoids the
implication that the service was intentionally taken down for maintenance
(my first reaction both here and on Solaris).

-- 
Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux