Matthew Miller (mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > So, I'm honestly asking: what are the odds that these few things are the > only improvements that cause a disruptive change to user interaction? I > don't think it's unreasonable to wonder if there are other changes which fit > this category. My concern with this line of thinking is that you're asking us to quantify the unknown unknown, and define a time period of testing which is 'long enough' for us to catch all the unknown unknowns. This seems impractical, in as much as it doesn't give us any clear criteria to define success with. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
