On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 18:01 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > It doesn't change anything, though. No feedback => nothing to rely on. > These recent discussions on this list could have been fruitful, btw. > For some people it has become a game of "I'm right - you aren't", > unfortunately. Nothing like that. It just frustrates me when people don't debate correctly. (Yes, there is a correct way to debate - take a philosophy class). Replying to my post in which I said something, cutting out the bit where I said it, and then saying the same thing as if it contradicts what my post said - what does that achieve, exactly? Again, I already acknowledged that the current process does not notice all problems in candidate updates. All I've said is that it _does_ notice some problems, and the fact that an update has 0 feedback is not an indication that no-one has tried it and checked it doesn't make their system blow up. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
