On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:05:23PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 08:02 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Why? Because you say so? We aren't doing that stuff now and things are > > working just fine, thank you very much! We don't HAVE to change anything at > > all! > > > > This I believe to be the crux of the problem. When multiple updates go > out that break large or important segments of our user base, many of us > see a problem. You however seem to think it's "just fine". Many of us > would rather put out a better operating system, and to do that, we need > change. Your "just fine" isn't good enough. Are there even any metrics about how many bad updates happened? For me bug that can be fixed issuing an update are a lot more than regressions with updates or new bugs introduced with updates. If updates are slowed down, this will get even worse. Especially because the proposal is to use time instead of test coverage as the criterion to push an update to stable. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgprjukoJYOzg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
