On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:07:29PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Jesse Keating wrote: > > Ok... removing deprecated uses is a questionable at best update, but > > here is the kicker. The perl in F11 is perl-5.10.0-82.fc11. So these > > functions aren't actually deprecated in F11. So... why is this update > > going out? What possible benefit does the user get from this? Does > > anybody see this as a reasonable update to publish on F11? > > > > the suggestion I had made at fudcon went something like this: > > 1. all packages being put in as updates would need to be marked as per > the type of update. the default is 'trivial'. Options might include: new > pkg, trivial, feature, bugfix, security > > 2. We would issue security updates whenever they happened. Issue bugfix > updates once every 2 weeks. Everything else once a month. > > it would curtail this sort of thing, it seems to me and let us control our > updates AND testing cycle. > > I've been thinking about the obvious problems of how we make it so you can > build those properly and I think we would need more targets to build > against, but I think that's do-able. > FWIW, +1 to this general outline. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpdzGXbckJXP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
