On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Seth Vidal wrote: >> At the risk of complicating the world would it make any sense for us to >> have (in increasing order of importance) >> >> updates-testing >> updates >> updates-important >> >> packages that are security or critical go from updates-testing to >> updates-important - and that happens as necessary >> >> all other updates go from updates-testing to updates once a month. > > And what problem would that solve? All I see is it causes problems for those > people who need the updates you don't judge "important". And stages non-critical/important updates so our QA team can test and check them over more thoroughly and align testing goals and days to help foster and create a more active and involved testing infrastructure. This is what we HAVE to do. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
