On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:05:23PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 08:02 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> Why? Because you say so? We aren't doing that stuff now and things are >>> working just fine, thank you very much! We don't HAVE to change anything at >>> all! >>> >> >> This I believe to be the crux of the problem. When multiple updates go >> out that break large or important segments of our user base, many of us >> see a problem. You however seem to think it's "just fine". Many of us >> would rather put out a better operating system, and to do that, we need >> change. Your "just fine" isn't good enough. > > Are there even any metrics about how many bad updates happened? For me > bug that can be fixed issuing an update are a lot more than regressions > with updates or new bugs introduced with updates. If updates are slowed > down, this will get even worse. Especially because the proposal is to > use time instead of test coverage as the criterion to push an update to > stable. Actually the proposal is time AND test coverage. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
