On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 17:04 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > I mind have misunderstood it, but afaics it only says that it will be > tested, because it spent time in updates-testing, but this is not even > true nowadays, even if packages stay long in updates-testing. as we've explained several times, most packages that go to updates-testing for a few days *are* being tested, even if they get no apparent Bodhi feedback. Several QA group members run with updates-testing enabled and so get all packages (that they have installed) which go through updates-testing. They do not file positive feedback for every single package because there's just too many, but if they notice breakage, they file negative feedback. So - for the third time - a package being in updates-testing for a few days and getting no negative feedback is a moderate strength indicator that it's not egregiously broken. Not a super-strong indicator, but better than a kick in the teeth. This is why what winds up getting proposed to FESco is probably going to be something along the lines of *either* acquiring a certain level of positive feedback *or* sitting in testing for a few days without acquiring any negative feedback. So you can either submit your update and wait a few days to push it, or submit it and ask a couple of people to test it and post positive feedback, and then you'll be able to push it immediately. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
