On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 16:51 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > To be pedantic, Fedora is what it is. What the leadership has to say > doesn't really matter in terms of what Fedora *is*, only in terms of > what Fedora is *supposed to be*. In order to know what Fedora really > is, a person would need to look over the updates that have been pushed > to F-11 and F-12 and compare those to what's in rawhide and maybe F-13 > and see if wholesale package updates are being reserved for rawhide or > if wholesale updates are being pushed on down into the stable releases. > At that point you would know for sure what Fedora is, not what it's > supposed to be. I say this because, obviously, different people read > the part about First differently and do different things. Right, there are obviously people who feel that what Fedora Is is "broken". The status quo isn't working, and that's why FESCo or members of FESCo are trying to come up with ways to fix that. A lot of the argument here seems to be disagreement about what Fedora Should Be, which is precisely an issue the Fedora board has been struggling with. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
