On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 01:40 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > While the ethos as defined on the wiki mentions staying close to upstream > > and getting the latest software, there's nothing that says that it's done > > via updates. I would not categorically state that your reading is the > > only valid reading, or even close to the canonical one. > > > > In fact, the wiki implies that this is done via the rapid release cycle, > > not updates. > > It may not be strictly codified, but in practice it is a big part of what > Fedora is and many users choose it for that. And it is also the main > technical difference between us and Ubuntu. (I know there's also the > licensing stuff, like Ubuntu bundling proprietary drivers, but that's not > that big a difference in practice, it's not like those drivers cannot be > easily removed (or added, yuck!).) > > Kevin Kofler > You keep speaking, authoritatively, about what Fedora is. As of yet, I haven't seen anything from our leadership that would agree with your statements. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
