Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 17:39 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Can you expand on "must be tested"?
> 
> Some test updates just don't get any testing.
> 
> Audacity 1.3.10-beta
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13139
> (2009-12-09 to 2010-01-26)
> 
> Audacity 1.3.11-beta
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0968
> (since 2010-01-24) 

It'll require some enhancements to how bodhi is used for people
consuming testing updates, and it may require a more active role on part
of the maintainer to seek out somebody to at least give the update a
smoke test.  Instead of treating updates-testing users as a black box
that you may or may not get any output from, we should have a more
direct relationship.  Maybe something in the Fedora Engineering Services
initiative could be to spend some time smoke testing updates-testing
stuff.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux