On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:42 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
> > On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 16:29 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Am I missing something? Do people think this would be better, or
> > > worse?
> >
> > I muffed up fedora-release on rawhide, but here was my plan.
> >
> > rawhide:
> > fedora-release requires fedora-release-rawhide
> > All repos except for rawhide disabled. Rawhide enabled.
> > This state never changes, the only thing that changes is package
> > version goes up each time we branch. 13, 14, 15, etc...
>
> How about just have fedora-release contain only the rawhide
> repo, and have 'Obsoletes: fedora-release-rawhide < %{version}'?
>
> Bill
That might work, but would cause me some more shuffling each time I
branch the master for a Fedora release. What's the net positive gain
here?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
