Re: fedora-release-rawhide, et. al.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > > I muffed up fedora-release on rawhide, but here was my plan.
> > > 
> > > rawhide:
> > >   fedora-release requires fedora-release-rawhide
> > >   All repos except for rawhide disabled.  Rawhide enabled.
> > >   This state never changes, the only thing that changes is package
> > > version goes up each time we branch.  13, 14, 15, etc...
> > 
> > How about just have fedora-release contain only the rawhide
> > repo, and have 'Obsoletes: fedora-release-rawhide < %{version}'?
> 
> That might work, but would cause me some more shuffling each time I
> branch the master for a Fedora release.  What's the net positive gain
> here?

Mainly, it removes the repository definitions in rawhide that don't make
sense - the release, updates, updates-testing, etc. repos won't work anyway
unless you change $releasever in some way.

Bill
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux