On 2/26/2010 11:07, Jesse Keating wrote: > It'll require some enhancements to how bodhi is used for people > consuming testing updates, and it may require a more active role on part > of the maintainer to seek out somebody to at least give the update a > smoke test. Instead of treating updates-testing users as a black box > that you may or may not get any output from, we should have a more > direct relationship. Maybe something in the Fedora Engineering Services > initiative could be to spend some time smoke testing updates-testing > stuff. Forgive me if I'm missing something, but isn't that QA's job? Maybe what we really need is a push for more QA people. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
