Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:16 -0600, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On 2/26/2010 11:07, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > It'll require some enhancements to how bodhi is used for people
> > consuming testing updates, and it may require a more active role on part
> > of the maintainer to seek out somebody to at least give the update a
> > smoke test.  Instead of treating updates-testing users as a black box
> > that you may or may not get any output from, we should have a more
> > direct relationship.  Maybe something in the Fedora Engineering Services
> > initiative could be to spend some time smoke testing updates-testing
> > stuff.
> 
> Forgive me if I'm missing something, but isn't that QA's job?  Maybe 
> what we really need is a push for more QA people.

QA is an engineering service, and a volunteer effort.  The Fedora
Engineering Services initiative seems to fit that role.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux