Re: fedora-release-rawhide, et. al.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 16:29 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Am I missing something? Do people think this would be better, or
> worse?

I muffed up fedora-release on rawhide, but here was my plan.

rawhide:
  fedora-release requires fedora-release-rawhide
  All repos except for rawhide disabled.  Rawhide enabled.
  This state never changes, the only thing that changes is package
version goes up each time we branch.  13, 14, 15, etc...

branched:
  fedora-release does not require fedora-release-rawhide
  fedora and updates-testing repos enabled, all others disabled

release:
  fedora-release does not require fedora-release-rawhide
  fedora and updates repos enabled, all others disabled.


With this scenario, I do believe we'll have the functionality we want.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux