Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:49:00PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, drago01 wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Mike McGrath  wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> Though, in theory, fewer updates means a higher percentage of them can be
> >> tested which means quality goes up.
> >
> > Even if this might start another flamewar ... I like the idea of
> > having less updates.
> >
> > The  "the version number changed so we need to update the fedora
> > package" attitude needs to stop.
> 
> May I ask why? Can you elaborate on why there is such a "need"? Who
> "need's this?

lots of people. Some want to review changes manually and udpate only "important" 
things, 

Others don not have gigabit internet access all around the clock. I am trying to update 
my Netbook over a mobile connection as I write this.

Richard
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux