On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:49:00PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, drago01 wrote: >> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> Though, in theory, fewer updates means a higher percentage of them can be >> >> tested which means quality goes up. >> > >> > Even if this might start another flamewar ... I like the idea of >> > having less updates. >> > >> > The "the version number changed so we need to update the fedora >> > package" attitude needs to stop. >> >> May I ask why? Can you elaborate on why there is such a "need"? Who >> "need's this? > > lots of people. Some want to review changes manually and udpate only "important" > things, > Exactly! And we have a good tool for this. People can opt to do selective updates. They can just ignore the "Enhancement" updates and do the "Bugfix" updates only. They can even do a subset of these bugfix updates if they consider the bugfixes not important. I didn't see many users complaining that there are too many updates. But I saw many pissed off users because they don't have certain updates and because they are told to wait 6 months. Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
