On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:16:18PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:49:00PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, drago01 wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > > >> [...] > > >> Though, in theory, fewer updates means a higher percentage of them can be > > >> tested which means quality goes up. > > > > > > Even if this might start another flamewar ... I like the idea of > > > having less updates. > > > > > > The "the version number changed so we need to update the fedora > > > package" attitude needs to stop. > > > > May I ask why? Can you elaborate on why there is such a "need"? Who > > "need's this? I hope people who are not the targeted audience of Fedora, because the four foundations of Fedora (“Freedom, Friends, Features, First”) include "first. > lots of people. Some want to review changes manually and udpate only "important" > things, Imho it is easier to review small changes than big changes. > Others don not have gigabit internet access all around the clock. I am trying to update > my Netbook over a mobile connection as I write this. But why do you want to update your Netbook anyhow? And with yum-presto the demand for high speed internet access is not that big. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpesD5iIeWvL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
