Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Till Maas wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 02:55:36PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>> Yes, I believe the expression you're looking for is:
>>
>> "Perfect is the enemy of the good"
>>
>> What is being suggested is not perfect. It is, however, good.
>
> Here we disagree. As I explained I see little use in it, since there are
> other methods that work at least as good as this on, but are less
> annoying. And they might even perform better, wrt to the challenge to
> find unmaintained packages. Or in other words, I do not trust in the
> mass bugfiling method, so the other methods still need to be implemented
> to get the information I am interested in.
>
> Also I cannot remember any argument from you that explains why your
> solution is superior to the other solutions.
>

I've not heard any other solutions which aren't "oh just let it be."

-sv

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux