On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 14:04 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > > I think there should be at least two conditions which would have to be > > fulfilled for the nagging bug to be created - the package was not > > touched by the maintainer during recent x months and at least one bug is > > opened not closed in the bugzilla on the package. > > > > I disagree about the bug being open. A lack of filed bugs could mean that > no one CARES about the pkg at all. And if we have pkgs which are not being > maintained AND no one cares enough to file a bug about then either they > are: > > 1. extraordinarily stable > 2. dead upstreams > 3. unmaintained > 4. unusued > > in ANY of those cases I'd want to start thinking about nuking the pkg from > fedora. So that means that for example for the openoffice.org-dict-cs_CZ package I'll get the nag bug report before each and every Fedora release? It is definitely not 4. however 1. and 2. apply to it. As this is just a czech spelling and hyphenation dictionary which is pretty good one and we do not have any alternative anyway I do not think that 2. matters much. OK, I think my next changelog entry in the .spec will be something like: - rebuilding just for the sake of not getting a nonsense bug report opened against the package -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel