On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 12:25 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Ugh, this seems like it would just create a lot of make-work for the > > common case where packages *are* maintained. Perhaps only do this > > for packages that appear via some criteria (have not been built, have > > not been committed to, have lots of bugs with no response, etc.), but > > doing it for *every* package seems like overkill. > > > > Right - so maybe last check into devel branch since the last release of > the distro. > > If we do that check before the alpha release that should let us track down > awol maintainers and unmaintained pkgs pretty easily, I think. > > thoughts? I think there should be at least two conditions which would have to be fulfilled for the nagging bug to be created - the package was not touched by the maintainer during recent x months and at least one bug is opened not closed in the bugzilla on the package. -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel