On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:01:23 +0100, Tomas wrote: > I think there should be at least two conditions which would have to be > fulfilled for the nagging bug to be created - the package was not > touched by the maintainer during recent x months and at least one bug is > opened not closed in the bugzilla on the package. Taking into account bugzilla ticket statistics is much more interesting anyway, especially if combined with a package's FTBFS status *and* FAS account status *and* bugzilla account status (= password renewed and date of last login) *and* perhaps even scm-commit/koji-access status. There are automated mass-rebuilds. There are provenpackagers who rebuild packages for SONAME bumps and even for FTBFS. Packages are touched regularly. But what does that tell about the package's owner and the package itself? Who notices if a package has N open tickets, of which N have not seen any comment from the package's single maintainer in M months? With X additional tickets CLOSED/INSUFFICIENT_DATA at EOL because reporters didn't respond to the very late EOL NEEDINFO query either. How much do N, M and X grow before an orphan package or a non-responsive maintainer is discovered? -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
