Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:

> Ugh, this seems like it would just create a lot of make-work for the
> common case where packages *are* maintained. Perhaps only do this
> for packages that appear via some criteria (have not been built, have
> not been committed to, have lots of bugs with no response, etc.), but
> doing it for *every* package seems like overkill.
>

Right - so maybe last check into devel branch since the last release of 
the distro.

If we do that check before the alpha release that should let us track down 
awol maintainers and unmaintained pkgs pretty easily, I think.

thoughts?
-sv

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux