On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:25:44PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Ugh, this seems like it would just create a lot of make-work for the > > common case where packages *are* maintained. Perhaps only do this > > for packages that appear via some criteria (have not been built, have > > not been committed to, have lots of bugs with no response, etc.), but > > doing it for *every* package seems like overkill. > > > > Right - so maybe last check into devel branch since the last release of > the distro. > > If we do that check before the alpha release that should let us track down > awol maintainers and unmaintained pkgs pretty easily, I think. The majority of my packages does not get updated that often (15 from 21) and there are also no bug reports unhandled for them. I am not sure how the ratio is for others, but it does not seem to be such a got criterion. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgp9gnvCHc7w4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
