On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Till Maas wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:25:44PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> >>> Ugh, this seems like it would just create a lot of make-work for the >>> common case where packages *are* maintained. Perhaps only do this >>> for packages that appear via some criteria (have not been built, have >>> not been committed to, have lots of bugs with no response, etc.), but >>> doing it for *every* package seems like overkill. >>> >> >> Right - so maybe last check into devel branch since the last release of >> the distro. >> >> If we do that check before the alpha release that should let us track down >> awol maintainers and unmaintained pkgs pretty easily, I think. > > The majority of my packages does not get updated that often (15 from 21) > and there are also no bug reports unhandled for them. > > I am not sure how the ratio is for others, but it does not seem to be > such a got criterion. so 15/21 your packages don't get rebuilt, atall, from release to release? Really? -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
