On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Till Maas wrote: > First of all, that would be two bug reports per year, as we have a 6 > month development cycle. But it also will not be that useful, as we > already have three things that have to be done by every maintainer once > or twice a year, so they can be easily used to track, whether or not a > maintainer is still around at all: FAS password, Koji certificate > Bugzilla password. > Then if you intend to catch unused packages, this will also fail unless > you also plan to implement some captcha for this for every package, > because there will be a script that a maintainer can run to close all > bugs for all of his packages at once, even for the packages he does not > maintain properly. So you will still only track down, whether or not a > packager is still around and not whether he cares about a certain > package. Yes, I believe the expression you're looking for is: "Perfect is the enemy of the good" What is being suggested is not perfect. It is, however, good. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
