On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 10/02/2009 04:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: So do we need to fix this? I think recognizing that there's different types of features and some of them can continue even if they are dropped while others must be (wholly or partially) reverted if they are dropped is step one. Putting more effort (tracking development, making sure that the owner knows what things need to be in place for what deadlines, finding extra manpower if possible if a feature is slipping) towards the ones that would need to be reverted if they don't complete is step two.
So it sounds like features for critical-path items need to be completely in or completely out. Versus features for non-critical path.
But is nfs critical path B/c anaconda can call mount to an nfs:// install point?
-sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
