Josh Boyer wrote: > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-06-12/fedora- > meeting.2009-06-12-17.01.html Ah, there it is, I must have missed it when going through the summaries, sorry. :-( So I'll have to blame the previous FESCo for voting this through with practically no feedback, as they observed themselves before the vote: 17:14:04 <nirik> has there been any feedback on lists or wiki? 17:14:15 * nirik just sees one 'sounds fine to me' comment on the discussion page 17:14:25 <notting> yeah, haven't seen much But in any case, I don't think any of us realized the amount of maintainer confusion this would cause (I know I didn't or I would have complained on the mailing list right when this was proposed). In hindsight, it was definitely a mistake. This thread is just one of the examples of maintainers having been led to believe they have more time to develop their features than they actually do, I've seen several more while sitting in FESCo feature meetings. We should fix the mistake at the first opportunity (Fedora 13). Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
