On Oct 1, 2009, at 2:28, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-06-12/fedora-
meeting.2009-06-12-17.01.html
Ah, there it is, I must have missed it when going through the
summaries,
sorry. :-(
So I'll have to blame the previous FESCo for voting this through with
practically no feedback, as they observed themselves before the vote:
17:14:04 <nirik> has there been any feedback on lists or wiki?
17:14:15 * nirik just sees one 'sounds fine to me' comment on the
discussion
page
17:14:25 <notting> yeah, haven't seen much
But in any case, I don't think any of us realized the amount of
maintainer
confusion this would cause (I know I didn't or I would have
complained on
the mailing list right when this was proposed). In hindsight, it was
definitely a mistake. This thread is just one of the examples of
maintainers
having been led to believe they have more time to develop their
features
than they actually do, I've seen several more while sitting in FESCo
feature
meetings. We should fix the mistake at the first opportunity (Fedora
13).
Or we should correct this that got confused and move on rather than
continuing to use our own made up meanings for otherwise industry
standard words or worse our own made up words.
--
Jes
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
