Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/29/2009 07:16 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 07:12:03PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> On 09/29/2009 06:55 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 06:21:35PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09/29/2009 06:13 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 17:52 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>>>>> I thought today was the dead line...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.linux-archive.org/fedora-development/372823-all-features-need-100-beta-freeze-2009-09-29-a.html 
>>>>>
>>>>> I should mention that Beta is the deadline to have the code in what we
>>>>> think is the final state, baring any glaring bugs, not a point to enable
>>>>> experimental code/settings for further experimentation.
>>>> This is in the final state... its been a 18 month effort to get this
>>>> accepted by upstream... 
>>>>
>>>> At the end of the day, I was just following the rules that were deemed by 
>>>> that email and a number of earlier ones... I'm a bit dumbfound...
>>>
>>> I think that what we need, Steve, is some sort of information about
>>> what testing has happened up to this point that satisfies FESCo that
>>> this change the equivalent of moving the needle from 99% complete to
>>> 100% complete, as opposed to moving from 90% complete to 91% complete
>>> (with testing being the last 9%).
>>>
>> Not a problem... I want to and will work closely with FESCo to make
>> sure we know all the ins and outs of this change... believe me my
>> slate is cleared for few weeks to be as responsive as possible 
>> for this new feature... In the end this will be a good thing... 
> [...snip...]
> 
> I want to be perfectly clear that I'm not sounding an "all clear" on
> this by any means.  If your answer here means that this change hasn't
> been thoroughly tested, you're going to have a hard time convincing
> anyone that it should be turning over on Beta freeze day.
> 
By no means did I interpret that at all... but here lies the
problem... I had no idea I would  have to convenience *anybody* 
of *anything* because I thought I made the dead line... again all
following was the schedule in:
        http://www.linux-archive.org/fedora-development/372823-all-features-need-100-beta-freeze-2009-09-29-a.html

And Today I am %100 finished... Please point out which part of that 
did I misinterpret, because the last thing I want to do is cause problems... 

steved.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux